The team at Kodi Fire IPTV strongly suggests that you use a VPN at all times. Be it for browsing, watching Kodi, watching IPTV or anything else – the one that we recommend is Quad VPN. They provide you with very fast speeds, while keeping you protected. They can also unblock most streaming sites in the US and UK!! Grab your own Quad VPN and regain your online privacy now!
Jesus…look at the f'ing comments here. This was a piece of shit movie… Just another Left Wing sack of shit "PC" movie. This time trying to portray the American Western as a bunch of limp-wristed pedophiles running around on a ranch sucking each other off. Reason # 694 why the Oscars are garbage and why there will be backlash on Liberals in Nov '22.
"Wonderful, superb, fantastic, excellent, the best, masterpiece, mesmerizing, astonishing" This is the AGENDA that is being pushed so even a POS can be categorized as this great masterpiece when it stinks to hell like all AGENDA's!
Sam Elliott is slamming this movie as another "gay" movie. We are in 2022, people. I grew up on a farm in the 1960's. I am as much a man as Sam Elliott, but I happen to be gay. When can we look past the stereotypes and realize that a man is a man, not matter his sexuality. I have kicked the asses of many 'straight' men because I had to. It was a necessity. I want to be recognized as a man…period.
Is this movie out now? Did anyone actually watch it? Cause no one wants to see that stuff, no matter how pretty you dress it up. Really. Knock it off, Hollywood.
A movie poorly portraying American cowboys and filmed in New Zealand, this movie does not fit real American western qualities and is a evisceration of the American myth. Like a true American cowboy said, "It's a piece of shit".
This movie come across like a fake coming of age movie, using the expansion to the west as an scenario to a very contrive story of femenine archetipes, not even homosexuality per se: for once because at those times there was no differentiation between gay and straight, you either were queer or not – read rubyfruit jungle – and in the other side, sex between men happened all the time it was just under the rug as it is implied in "the will be blood" or more clearly in "Brokenback mountain".
There's historical fiction, and there's historical bastardization. Which one is this? A small group can try to use production value to create a fictional framing of history that fits their present narrative, yet people have a sense of Truth. To begin with – there's no need to wear chaps all of the time, in fact not at all when herding a bunch of docile herefords with udders dragging on the ground. Chaps are heavy, stinky, clothes are stained. Cowboys were never pretty like the costumeboys of today.
Secondly, people were religious back then, in a simple way. They believed in God and the rules of the Bible, even if they were not obedient – they were not interested in existential crisis. They had to focus on surviving and how to live so as to avoid actual crisis.
For people born of the 1800s, need was the driver of life. Cowboys weren't driven by 'identity' or acting like a cowboy or macho or whatever. Ranch work involved no luxury, it was rough work involving exposure to the elements and occasional serious dangers. A man needed to be prepared for natural calamity, accident, drunken & criminal conflict. There was not much pretense. A man could go as far as his strength and luck took him. The entire premise of this film is that the 'toxic masculinity' was a projection relating to identity issues. This is a cute theory, yet relates not at all to the truth. In a world where death could be dealt arbitrarily, one's focus was on survival – which meant actually being tough and capable. There was little time to think of anything else.
No one would be as incapable as the character Peter in those times. Women and children would be able to handle horses, guns, hunting, life stock, and nearly all elements of life. Every grown man would have a basic proficiency in all areas. The drama presented could legitimately be played out in many 20th century urban settings. Why they chose to dress it us on a dude ranch is the real question.
Lol. This show stupid.
This movie is quite literally 2 hours of nothing
The Power of the Gay
This looks terrible def won’t be watching
this is the most abhorrent film that does not portray western life in the least… this may be how things were in New Zealand, but not in the west….
"Piece of shit" – Sam Elliot
So how old is the boy?
Jesus…look at the f'ing comments here.
This was a piece of shit movie…
Just another Left Wing sack of shit "PC" movie. This time trying to portray the American Western as a bunch of limp-wristed pedophiles running around on a ranch sucking each other off.
Reason # 694 why the Oscars are garbage and why there will be backlash on Liberals in Nov '22.
Massive garbage
Wait a minute so the villiain is a jerk to the feminine kid then hes hitting on the kid?? WTF
overrated. I saw this movie, and I think it's a pretentious pile of shit.
Haven't seen it but what I get from trailer was that Sam Elliott is right.
Ah damn I thought this was going to be about the Don Winslow book series.
Really crap creepy movie.
Sam Elliot gives this movie two spurs down.
A piece of shit film.
"Wonderful, superb, fantastic, excellent, the best, masterpiece, mesmerizing, astonishing"
This is the AGENDA that is being pushed so even a POS can be categorized as this great masterpiece when it stinks to hell like all AGENDA's!
Looks like they probably missed the mark on this one.
Sam Elliott is slamming this movie as another "gay" movie. We are in 2022, people. I grew up on a farm in the 1960's. I am as much a man as Sam Elliott, but I happen to be gay. When can we look past the stereotypes and realize that a man is a man, not matter his sexuality. I have kicked the asses of many 'straight' men because I had to. It was a necessity. I want to be recognized as a man…period.
Is this movie out now? Did anyone actually watch it? Cause no one wants to see that stuff, no matter how pretty you dress it up. Really. Knock it off, Hollywood.
What a monumental piece of human shit this so call movie was, don't waste any second on this monument to human wokeness stupidity.
A movie poorly portraying American cowboys and filmed in New Zealand, this movie does not fit real American western qualities and is a evisceration of the American myth. Like a true American cowboy said, "It's a piece of shit".
Incerting the Cumbercucumber into the creamy twink…
This movie come across like a fake coming of age movie, using the expansion to the west as an scenario to a very contrive story of femenine archetipes, not even homosexuality per se: for once because at those times there was no differentiation between gay and straight, you either were queer or not – read rubyfruit jungle – and in the other side, sex between men happened all the time it was just under the rug as it is implied in "the will be blood" or more clearly in "Brokenback mountain".
I heard it sucked
Broke back mountain the prequel lmao
There's historical fiction, and there's historical bastardization. Which one is this?
A small group can try to use production value to create a fictional framing of history that fits their present narrative, yet people have a sense of Truth.
To begin with – there's no need to wear chaps all of the time, in fact not at all when herding a bunch of docile herefords with udders dragging on the ground. Chaps are heavy, stinky, clothes are stained. Cowboys were never pretty like the costumeboys of today.
Secondly, people were religious back then, in a simple way. They believed in God and the rules of the Bible, even if they were not obedient – they were not interested in existential crisis. They had to focus on surviving and how to live so as to avoid actual crisis.
For people born of the 1800s, need was the driver of life. Cowboys weren't driven by 'identity' or acting like a cowboy or macho or whatever. Ranch work involved no luxury, it was rough work involving exposure to the elements and occasional serious dangers. A man needed to be prepared for natural calamity, accident, drunken & criminal conflict. There was not much pretense. A man could go as far as his strength and luck took him.
The entire premise of this film is that the 'toxic masculinity' was a projection relating to identity issues. This is a cute theory, yet relates not at all to the truth. In a world where death could be dealt arbitrarily, one's focus was on survival – which meant actually being tough and capable. There was little time to think of anything else.
No one would be as incapable as the character Peter in those times. Women and children would be able to handle horses, guns, hunting, life stock, and nearly all elements of life. Every grown man would have a basic proficiency in all areas. The drama presented could legitimately be played out in many 20th century urban settings. Why they chose to dress it us on a dude ranch is the real question.